Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4583
It’s quite probable that gold has entered a “transitional resting period” as Martin Armstrong pointed out in his most recent letter when his key identified 1372 level was on the verge of giving way.
Gold $1345.10 UP $2.70
Silver $27.32 DOWN $0.21Mr. Armstrong’s word “transitional” in this gold bull market is a euphemism for laying back and take a rest where declining days are predominant and emphasis is on greater daily percentage declines than advances.
Access to Mr. Armstrong’s letter,” Are You Ready To Rumble,” can be accessed at http://www.martinarmstrong.org.
To add my own two cents in, it was not favorable when the gold price recently sold below its 50 day moving average level at just above 1380 and yesterday, when it cracked its 100 day average line in the neighborhood of 1353.
It is expected that the dark forces will heavily lean on the gold price it nears the 1350 area and just above. While the price remains under these two levels, it appears gold will experience Armstrong’s traditional phase with lower prices.
It will be important to read Armstrong’s analysis of gold in his recent letter. This, as he stated, is all totally normal within this bull market.
You should prepare yourselves with resolve in the weeks ahead and possibly for a few months, or so.
At the outside, bull markets can surprise followers with change of direction to the upside without notice and can be quite powerful within the primary trend.
Let’s hope this new transitional period ends sooner, rather than later.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4586Yes, I’ve been $-averaging in each month as well, but with m-funds, not the real stuff. This is where I’ll start.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4585Rick
I buy some gold and silver each month and have been doing so for some time, with silver receiving most of the allotment in the last two years.
I believe that’s the best way to accumulate it. This is my insurance policy against the know-it-alls messing with our money.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4584It wasn’t that long ago when ‘Gold Resting at $1345/otz’ would have seemed like a headline from an outter-space movie.
No, I still haven’t pulled the $$ from the market mutual-funds…but remember telling myself to do it if we bounced back to 10K on the Dow.
I guess the only thing keeping me from doing it is not doing it…because the title of this topic has survived for five years+ ….and there is nothing but impending inflation looming. (Okay, Bluejay, I am about 25% in gold..considering that move to 75%…so, why am I shy?)
Perhaps not shy of doing it…just not doing it. I know that when my $$ is sitting in the most valuable of hard assests this planet has ever known, I’ll breath a sigh of relief.
Thanks Bluejay. Time to go.
in reply to: Miscellaneous #4582The Water Board is like the SEC for its ineptness, go after the little fish and let the sharks swim away.
“Laws and restrictive regulations are imposed that are so convoluted and impossible to navigate that the little guys are strangled in endless red tape. But the bigs slip through specially designed loop-holes or are politically protected and left alone.”
Gerald Celente – The Trends Journal
Winter Issue – 2011“Screw the People”
in reply to: Stock exchange listing #45814650 shares traded yesterday at $0.25
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4580Gold $1341.30 DOWN $4.30
Silver $27.42 DOWN $0.05The war is on.
The CME, again, raises margins on gold and silver contracts. If this isn’t ludicrous with weakness in these two metals, I’d like to know what is.
This has nothing to do with the public’s interest. It is all about protecting the losing positions of its shorting members who remain under water as a result of past months strength in these metals. The CME, not only is a house of cards with its phony paper products, it’s a brazen manipulator with the continuing blessings from federal regulators. No wonder investors of all types are exiting markets of all kinds, it’s a fixed game.
This is just another inflicted hiccup to mess with your mind in their attempt to scare you out of your position in gold and silver so their member buddies that don’t know how to trade can get a free pass for their mistakes.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4579It’s just a matter of time before the physical market in gold and silver crushes the comical paper market.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4578Gold $1345.90 DOWN $24.60
Silver $27.54 DOWN $ 1.23The miscreants continue their paper charades on the Comex today. Selling the paper products, sorry we don’t have the physical, in the form of special drivatives, futures and options continues to suppress gold and silver prices. Isn’t this a great game, watching the wagon pull the horse over our rose garden? What’s next, will they be telling us that investing in municipal bonds is the safest bet in town?
Unfortunately, we must indure this semi-sophisticated attempt to currupt our minds. Don’t let this sideshow of bogeymen running all over the precious metals markets fool you. Stand fast and increase your holdings as a dying fiat will NEVER replace gold and silver in this environment regardless of the music they are playing.
There has never been one instance of “striking up the band” that prevented a sinking ship from going under.
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4577A shareholder wrote the PLF suggesting it gets involved in our situation. A case management analyst declined for reason that resembled “boiler plated language”. Following is my response, which was copied to the PLF president as well.
Pacific Legal Foundation January 11, 2011
3900 Lennane Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, Ca 95834Dear Teresa Sotelo,
Upon review of the letter you sent to Ren Renzel, your conclusion is actually contrary to the fine policy, goals and work of the Pacific Legal Foundation. The foundation should undertake the matter thrust upon Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc. (O16).
Please reverse your conclusion after considering information that you probably did not have.
1. O16 has legal representation. It has answered the complaint filed by the Attorney General on behalf of the People of California. The foundation is not sought for its representation but for its research and experience as advisors. There will be no client/attorney obligations and a suitable agreement will clarify this point.
2. O16’s legal defense will not be the responsibility of the foundation.
3. The underlying “root” issues advanced by the Attorney General on behalf of the People of California hurt all Californians and have evolved over thirty years of lawlessness between the three branches of our government. A strong case exists that the foundation’s involvement may increase donations to the foundation beyond the actual time spent; witness the behavior of Mr. Renzel, who brought this issue to the foundation, reinstated his support after years of abstinence and also contributed to O16’s legal defense fund.
4. Squashing the misguided claims by the California Regional Water Board, Central Valley Region staff will advance legal precedents that will help the people of California and people and business throughout the United States. The issues claimed by the water agency rock the very foundation of appropriateness for PLF participation.
5. The complaint was filed in May 2009. It has been answered. Admission requests, interrogatories and depositions have taken place. The time for defendants’ effort is at hand. Yes, the State of California is more powerful that O16, another righteous reason for PLF involvement. If this lawsuit remains successfully unchallenged, a great loss to the public’s well-being will follow. The public knows that the overreach of environmental claims of harm have resulted in lessening the quality of life for Californians. The public needs champions to push the pendulum of overreach to the center. Our situation is a prime example of an administrative agency going beyond the underlying legislation that created its very existence. PLF should suppress fear mongering by government personnel and others. Our government must be a leader of ethical business practices. When it goes astray, someone must set it back on the proper path.I hope the above addresses your stated concerns as to why PLF should not get involved. Following are items that should be recognized so PLF does get involved.
My personal first contact with PLF was about 1978. I was prosecuted twice for misdemeanor infractions and acquitted in the second trial. I paid for the expenses of my defense. The issues were pretended to be environmental. They were not. They were power grabs under the disguise of environmental protection. The game warden and district attorney for Sierra County conspired to abuse the law. It was wrong. It adversely affected the public welfare in Sierra County and California; so I filed a lawsuit for damages, which reached the appellate court. I called PLF but was unsuccessful in getting help to push back phony environmental behavior from our government employees. My contact was Rob Rivett. The game warden was eventually fired for stealing gas and the DA was not reelected in Sierra County.
My second contact with PLF was in 2005, and I spoke with Rob again. The mine, its manager and I (its president) were criminally charged with felony manslaughter after a tragic accident took the life of our friend and fellow miner. The private prosecutors worked for the California District Attorney Association. Gale filter was the leader of four attorneys who infiltrated small northern counties and took over prosecution. A Sierra Court judge set aside the criminal charges, case over. It was not over for my friend and seasoned attorney, George Gilmour. After the dismissal is when I called PLF for help.
The CDAA lawyers broke several laws during their presentation to the Sierra County Grand Jury. George and I, along with the support of everyone who knew the facts of this unspeakable dastardly behavior by officers of the court, filed a lawsuit to expose the lawyers’ behavior and intentions to privatize prosecution and criminalize accidents. (The Grand Jury transcript records it all.) We broke the special privilege of “prosecutor immunity”, won every motion the defense put forth and lost in the Third Court of Appeals based upon the most ridiculous legal nonsense most of us have ever read. The PLF refused to help us with the same reasons you state.If the practices displayed by the well-respected CDAA were not stopped, the public would be one step closer to servitude without representation under the law. I was unable to convince Rob that withholding exculpatory evidence, committed perjury by a member of the California State Bar, and misleading the court were serious impediments to establishing public well being. (The record supports these allegations.) Mr. Gale Filter is named in a report for prosecutorial misconduct, recently released by the Northern California Innocence Project at the Santa Clara University (a copy of a newspaper article is enclosed). Gale Filter left CDAA and now is employed by the State of California and the EPA enforcer. He should be disbarred from practicing law in California.
This is my third attempt to engage PLF in legal situations that affect everyone in California. It goes to the heart of the trust we give our three branches of government.
When those trusts are broken, the behavior must become publicly wide spread in order to change the patterns of behavior. Right now poor execution of regulations is hurting the job market, businesses and financial revenue sources for government. Do you doubt these assertions?In our global economy and market place, domestic production, which means local, is in the public’s best interest. Knowledgeable people recognize the Sixteen to One mine as the leader of principled gold mining in the twenty-first century. Its operation touches three centuries of mining in California. It is the oldest US publicly owned gold mining corporation. It also was established under California law. It has historical value, educational value and economic value for all of us. It is under a ruthless attack and an unlawful one, I might add.
California has one of the worlds most proven gold deposits. It is the 200 mile gold belt in the Sierra Nevada mountain range. It sits under producing for obvious reasons. This is not in California’s best interest, especially for the proclaimed environmental advocates. They just are plain ignorant of the realities of science. Unfortunately, the California water agency that is responsible for administrating the law in Sierra County is failing its duty to the People of the State of California. The personnel may be ignorant but I suspect a small vocal minority decrying gloom and doom as well as spreading fear taints the agency. This is sad. The administration of all regulations must adhere to reality. Public agencies like the Central Valley Water Quality Regional Board must improve its behavior. The loss to California and the nation is too great to ignore.
Well, there is much more but this letter is growing longer than anticipated. Will it be three strikes and we are out? Let’s hope not for the sake of Californians. I am right. We sure could use the talent and resources of PLF to set a government agency back on the right path of protecting Californians. Your foundation will become proud of its support once it explores the issues and helps us defeat this unwarranted power grab.
Sincerely yours,
Michael Meister Millerin reply to: Clips from Alleghany #4576The longest Scoop silence has come to an end. December was ugly in the mountains. It was cold, wet and foggy or cloudy. The early winter climate change began in October and seemed to alter people’s mood, Scoop’s as well. What changed today? It must be the weather. Don’t know if the Sacramento valley remains under a cloud of fog but us mountain folks are feeling the warmth of one of California’s greatest assets…the sun. It must be over 60 degrees outside right now.
Social critic and defender of naturalism (born in 1819), John Ruskin wrote, “Sunshine is delicious, rain is refreshing, wind braces up, snow is exhilarating; there is no such thing as bad weather, only different kinds of good weather.” A long forgotten Englishman (born in 1608) wrote, “Change of weather is the discourse of fools.” Both observations have merit so Alleghany, the mine and many living in northern California’s gold country experienced an unusual fall/winter and are fools. What about those gold miners?
No whoops of joy, wild celebrations or new trucks occurred since November 27, but sometimes no news of despair were heard either. Whatever small underground work going on has continued uninterrupted only slightly by heavy snow, rain or other natural forces. What is unnatural seems to be the continuing oppression by just two California agencies based in Sacramento: central water and former mines and geology now called conservation. City folks need to visit the backcountry more often and observe the actual conditions and people living there. Sitting in a forced air heated room all day must dull a person’s cognition. Perhaps that is why some desk jockeys ride to the backcountry for replenishing their spirits. They are missing their duty, obligation or responsibility in the ongoing treatment of the Sixteen to One mine. Scoop is cautiously optimistic (hopeful is more honest) the fresh approach under the direction of Governor Brown reaches all of his executive departments. He is responsible for their conduct!
So how does Scoop see the attitude in Alleghany? The 2011 year will be a turn around and one to remember for great things.
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4575Bluejay,
Whoever you contacted needs to be unseated at the next election.
Please, let’s all contact our congression representative of the 4th District.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4574And…imagine if today’s un-funded liabilities had funded themselves with the backbone that gave birth to the US State of California, embracing its rich heritage of mining gold rather than trashing it.
Imagine also why they aren’t.
No imagination needed. Their design is to confiscate.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4573What’s behind this anomaly?
Gold $1373.30 DOWN $14.70
Silver $28.72 DOWN $ 0.93
USD 79.24 DOWN 0.74Broken down even further:
(figures supplied by kitco.com)Gold price change due to a weakening USD(U.S. dollar.)
UP $15.10Gold price change due to predominant sellers.
DOWN $29.80.Behind this classical take-down are the tracks of your favorite keeper spreading its decadence through its puppets, the bullion banks.
Remember, this current raid is taking place at the same time that the dollar is getting thrashed. Remember, 2008? That year the bankers raided the gold and silver markets unmercifully, broke all the rules selling contracts that had no physicsl behind them, naked short selling. This time, all the unethical tools are being employed again to hurt the folks who understand that they must hold gold and silver to protect their wealth.
All thoughout history fiat currencies have financially ruined millions of families around the world.When you understand that our keepers hate gold, along with silver, these attacks don’t surprise anyone that thoroughly comprehends their intent. Unfortunately for the government and the money changers, gold is an international currency. In time, over and over again, gold will be the consistent winner aside from these blantant sideshows.
When is the last time you have heard on television or read in the papers that gold has increased in value nearly 20% every year during the past 10 years?
How California Has Failed, Again.
If Calpers had invested in gold over this time their stock market returns would have been significantly different than the embarrassing 1.2% return that they have shown for the California public employees retirement fund.
If the State-run fund had any brains it wouldn’t be in the fix that is in today, underfunded by 50%. One has to wonder, how many “know it all” State employees it takes to screw-up thousands of retirees future?
I’ll match my 10 years return, anytime, with any of the over-paid California State employees with their big pensions who were in charge of making financial decisions for Calpers for the same time.
The real sad thing is, that the wealth contributed to Calpers for future pension payments, most probably, has lost nearly 50% of its real purchasing power during period, or so. As our currency continues to be debased by the Fed, expect this percentage to consistently grow. Calpers is a complete failure acting on the behalf of hard working State service employees.
Another relevant question is, how much money was wasted in running this organization into an almost zero performance return operation?
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4572Amen, Rick
It’s plainly, tyranny.
I asked my State elected officials for help in this matter and THEY ALL chose to ignore me.
They are all a pack of liars and cheats.
Check this out today from http://www.jsmineset.com:
Jim Sinclair’s Commentary
The unfunded state pension liabilities are $5.2 trillion, twice what they estimate.
States in the present business cannot tax their way out of their deficit and future liabilities. The sovereignty of state will come into question.
Bloomberg estimated 100 to 150 municipalities will go broke. That is very low.
The putts that scream about Europe should take a closer look at this.
in reply to: Stock exchange listing #4571I believe it’s based on the last transaction on the pink sheets, which was 0.10 a few weeks ago. This was for 300 shares, a whopping $30 transaction. These 300 share transactions seem to occur a few times a year, maybe to keep the market “made” at that price level in case a bona fide seller comes along. I’ve had standing bids at .20 and .25 but have had only one fill in more than a year. My broker acct uses the pink sheet most recent transaction as their basis.
in reply to: Stock exchange listing #4570Below on 11/09/09 cw3343 brought share ownership by Bank of the West. I tried the SEC.gov site but could not find the bank’s filings. Can anyone find them and see if the bank still owns 22,500 shares?
Now the reason I wrote under this topic. My Charles Schwab statement came today for the period October 1,2010 to December 31, 2010. I own a lot of shares and have the stock certificates in a safe place; however I left 18,510 shares in Schwab years ago to get information sent to me. Today I learned that my Sixteen to One account value started the period at $3,702 and ended the period at $1,851 or $0.10 a share. Where can I find sellers at $0.10? I’m a buyer.
I finished reading entries in this long-standing topic. Is Schwab part of the gray market or the pink sheet market? Where was the $0.10 price recorded? Answers anyone?
Thanks, Martin for your confidence. There will be a solution. It’s like finding gold when you have a detector signal. The miner knows he will sack high-grade but not how much. The company will get a proper market for our shares but we just don’t know the timing.
in reply to: Miscellaneous #4568Today, the Fed continues in ruining the value of our money like it has always done since its inception in 1913. The Fed is a private banking organization that has been gutting America’s wealth for nearly 100 years led by its largest shareholder, J.P. Morgan Chase.
One champion in the defense of the American people was Lewis T. Mcfadden. Learn more of what Mr. Mcfadden thought of the Fed in his speech to Congress in 1932:
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4569Everyone should be shocked:
The suing party, the Water Board (an insult to water), the plaintiffs, haven’t inspected the mine-site for 13 years??????? and yet they proceed to steal private property through a lawsuit???
Mike, knowing that every entry on this forum is probably admissable “evidence” in a litigation, I am completely shocked that they have the BALLS to continue.
Water Board: by ‘BALLS’ I mean your crushing and completely brash disregard for the very water you pretend to protect…the BALLS I’m talking about haven’t been in use since the mine discontinued the milling process.
HOW can an public agency created to oversee water in California blatantly proceed litigation without fullfilling its primary objective? They haven’t even gone up to look. They haven’t even gone up to measure themselves, despite the mandate that the burden of proof and monitoring water is their responsibility. They have given the middle finger.
Simple, in Statism terms:
1) forget primary objective
2) be corrupt
3) choose political target
4) assume nobody’s watching
5) pad your pockets with $$$ you don’t have yet and need to find
6) find it in a mine…. (“everyone’s against mining, right?”)
7) forget #5 which points out the debt which you forget and plan on confiscating anyway
7) call an appointed bench in advance and preparation for appeal, sctatch, scratch….
I could go on and on, but that would give away the defense.
Make no mistake about this: we are witnessing a quasi-governmental non-elected board of purchased a-holes attempting to steal private property. They will not prevail, and will be stopped.
THE TRUTH PREVAILS.
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4567The following letter was sent September 2008. I never received a response. The next correspondence from the water agency personnel was service of a lawsuit. On May 1, 2009, the People of California via the California Regional Water Quality Board filed a
“Complaint for Damages” in Sierra County. Is this how our administration government is supposed to work? It does not seem legal and after reading legislative matters it isn’t.Patricia Leary, Senior Engineer
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Central Valley Region
11020 Sun Center Drive #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114Resolution of Alleged Violation, Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc., Sierra County
Thank you for the opportunity to again address the issue of permits for the above California Corporation. Prior to the long sought staff inspection (July 2, 2008), the company asked for a reevaluation of its requirements and classification of its operation in Sierra County. As noted in the recent report, the last inspection of the mine by Regional Water Board staff was November 18, 1997. Due to significant changes in the operation and stated to the Regional Water Board, the reporting requirements were seriously out dated.
This small operating gold mine company spent in excess of $250,000 over the past twenty years on data accumulation, testing and mitigation. The results paint a clear picture that (1) there is no downstream evidence to suggest toxic discharge; (2) the annual water flows are predictable according to the four seasons and weather patterns; (3) the staff has turned a deaf ear to our company’s concerns about the science of this particular mine site as it relates to surface water flows and more. In the process the Regional Water Board has interfered with the company’s ability to operate and stay in business.
In your September 9, 2008 letter, #6 is true because the Regional Water Board staff is so backlogged with work that it could not react to our renewal request in a timely manner.
This Company has a 100-year history and a lifetime of environmental care and conservation. One visual inspection will confirm that California and its public is not threatened by the surface water that flows across the Company’s property. Testing has confirmed that the results are predictable and benign. To state otherwise is scientifically absurd.
Statement can always be misconstrued. For example in the last report under Observations and Comments, the writer reports, “600 pounds of mercury was historically used in the mill.” This is false. The operation is permitted to have 600 pounds on site. The amount is significantly less and it is retorted and recycled. There appears to still be ideas emanating in your agency that have no facts or evidence supporting them.
My suggestion or recommendation is to get some knowledgeable people who have authority to settle this permit process. The alternative is to go into the judicial branch of our government for a decision. This venerable company, which is a very important employer for workers in our region, has no desire to go there. Please reply.
Sincerely,
in reply to: Miscellaneous #4566A 100 ounce gold nugget found near Washington last year, south of our Plumbago Mine, is going up for auction in Sacramento in a few months.
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/01/05/100-ounce-gold-nugget-found-in-california-could-fetch-400-000/
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4564Gold $1369.80
Silver $28.69The following excerpt is from today’s International Forecaster:
As the destruction continues in an insolvent banking system banks continue to speculate in world markets again increasing leverage at the cost to the economy of not lending to most small and medium sized businesses. The Treasury carry trade is far more profitable. All this in an environment of flash trading, which is front running and is illegal, as is naked shorting, which the SEC refuses to do anything about. In addition, of course, is a rigged manipulated stock market whose license to steal was granted under Executive Order. These mechanisms are used to take markets in whatever direction government and the people who control government want them to go. Is it any wonder the public investor is leaving the markets in droves?
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4563Gold $1371.10
Silver $ 29.07In the past few days gold is down from the $1425 area while silver is down from above the $31 level. Adding to the downside pressure, gold sold beneath its 50 day moving average at about $1378 which should influence, as well, the silver prices to drift lower for the time being.
Most disturbing during this weakness is the dumping of excessive amounts of conterfeit gold and silver related shares known as naked short selling. This occurs when sell orders are accepted by the brokerage firms with no intention by some sellers of ever delivering the physical shares to them for submission to the clearing corp.
When it comes time within three days for some sellers to produce shares, only legally issued by the transfer agent, NOTHING HAPPENS. No one can know how many shares sold represent nothing but “hot air” but the clearing corp.
Either the clearing corp. is not reporting undeliverable shares to members of the exchanges or the OTC or they don’t care. It’s quite obvious connected people are the only ones that get away with this this type of fraud. If you and I tried it, the brokerage firms would come down hard on us and close our accounts.
For all intent and purposes, the folks behind this blatant sham are most likely the investment banks and the regulators that have been told by higher-ups to look the other way. It’s plain and simple, it just couldn’t be anything else.
So what do we do as shareholders in this environment? You do nothing as we are the hostages. You just watch as the money is temorarily ripped from our pockets in the short term or you get really scared when prices dive and you throw in the towel letting the criminals win thus enabling them to cover for a profit.
The same thing happens at the Comex. Naked short sellers force down gold and silver prices with no physical metal behind their executions. If all the holders of gold or silver contracts demanded physical delivery the Comex would have to close their doors, for it is certain the gold and silver are not there.
What we have in markets today is a bucket shop operation being co-mingled with real fully paid investors and sellers with physical shares to deliver. With the two classes of participants in markets these days, it is painfully clear we are not the favored ones.
Below is a link to a video with an educational message concerning silver that might surprise you.
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4562In the last newsletter # 53 on December 3, 2010, I mistakenly called the upcoming motion by the Attorney General on behalf of the water agency a “summary judgment”. The pending motion is a summary adjudication and is explained in the following civil code. The newsletter is posted under ‘NEWSLETTERS’ if you want to refresh your memory.
Grounds for and effect of summary adjudication; procedure on motion.
Par. 437c(f)(1) A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if that party contends that the cause of action has no merit or that there is no affirmative defense thereto, or that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, or both, or that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs. A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause or action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty.
(2) A motion for summary adjudication may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment. However, a party may not move for summary judgment based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication and denied by the court, newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion.
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4561Still on track….
This was always a rhetorical question, of course, to point out that arsenic and water were both around before the Water Board, CDAA and other criminal intents began their systematic attack on free enterprise and freedom, specifically targeting the Original Sixteen to One Mine and also Mike Miller personally by suggesting that somehow the mine and its CEO predated the natural deposits in the Sierra Nevada.
The answer is, by the way, arsenic. As the elements reset their new terrestrial atomic clocks through the differentiation of the planet, water arrived via asteroid and the subsequent chemical reactions to follow. (Incidentally, some comets emit arsenic in mass ejections.)
This, though, seems to have escaped the thugs…which of course makes sense to them, since facts are meerly a distraction when neo-communism and Marxism must prevail… (remember that distruction of history, historical facts and destruction of freedom are right up there at the top of their manifesto.)
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4560Sorry, we got off track…
Which came first, arsenic or waterIs it possible to know the answer to that? Maybe from a Geologists or Chemists point of view?
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4559Gold and Silver to advance during the first half of the new year. James Turk forecasts $1800 gold and $50 silver. Check out the full interview of James Turk by Eric King.
http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/12/30_James_Turk.html
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4558Rick,
On a side note to the other part of your last post…I am a weights & measures inspector for a Cen/Cal county & have much contact with “new” citizen business owners in my area like you described. Lets just say I see a lot of them at our local Tea Party gatherings…They are mostly hard working people that have jumped through uncountable hoops to achieve their dreams in America (most are legal residents/citizens) and are now absolutely buried by “fees and permits/costs…they don’t get it! They are also the object of extreme racism from other “minorities”.in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4557Thanks Rick & happy New Year!
I am a prolific letter writer and am good at it. I started when the Ca. Fish & Shame did their EIR for suction dredging back in 1994. Suction dredging used to be my passion (along w/Ca. history) but now it is standing up and fighting for our freedom! I will read the newsletter from Mike again then I’ll have some righteous stuff to write to some bureaucrats.in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4555Newsletter #53 is now available to read in full context. The prior posting cut off four pages. Thanks to a reader in Hawaii for bringing this to our attention. To see, go to index on left side of home page:Newsletters.
in reply to: Gold Enters Major Bull Market #4556Gold $1421.60 UP $17.60
Silver $30.91 UP $ 0.45
Copper $4.42 UP $ 0.08Copper was added as it has been very strong in December and is expected by Bob Chapman to hit $6 a pound in 2011.
Gold in the last trading day of the year put in an impressive close, as did silver. If a close on gold occurs in the excess of $1480, it is expected to go ballistic according Martin Armstrong. Silver, with a close over $30, is very near to going ballistic according to Eric from http://www.jsmineset.com.
Below is a link to a story entitled Hyperinflation Will Drive Gold To Heights Unthinkable. It is written by Egon von Greyerz from Gold Switzerland.
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4554TommyK…welcome aboard, and you’ve hit it on the head of the nail. Our focus is what the hell do we do about it!!!
You posting here is a start. We need to step it up and use everything we can…we are in survival mode.
I’m passing along all I can to every place that will listen. I implore you to do all you can cyber-link-wise, email-wise, word-of-mouth-wise, contact-Congress-wise, ALL we can muster.
This is not an exclusive issue to the Original Sixteen to One Mine. Although I am closely passioned to this particular outrage.
Yesterday I stopped for gasoline at a local stop. Yes, and ethnic owner, like me, although my heritage is highland Scott and his is middle-eastern; we exchanged similar outrages while exchanging commerce:
Me: “I guess the price of fuel is rising.”
him: “You cannot believe it, how difficult it is today to simply do business. Just a year ago, all I needed was to buy a lisence to run a business, a simple gasoline station, paying a tax to make a business, which was what we are willing to do. Now I can’t believe it!! @$#%^#!!!
“A tax for the gasoline. But now we are talking PERMITS, and when did this become a form of tax???
“Two years ago it was a single permit for the permission to operate a business with gasoline. Now we need to pay for new permits? Why? This is the same operation, and they ask for new permits? A permit for gasoline….a permit for cigarettes…a permit for beer…a permit for food…a permit for underground tanks…a permit for a permit!!! We are being taxed on tax!!!”
Somehow we all need to figure out a way to STOP THIS CRAP!
It may take me, a white guy with a passion for my country, along with a middle-eastern new immigrant gas-station-owning business to stand outside with a huge sign so that the “news” makes a drive-by mention of it; or it may take our Tea Party voices; or it may take a revolution, but I know it will take something.
The boiling point is here.
This Mine, and Mike at it’s helm, is one of our focal points. Time to get out of our shells and be heard. Let’s stategize and get busy.
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4553Howdy all,
Just signed on today but have been watching this tragedy unfold for many years, I am a former resident of Grass Valley (1978-1989). I will support the mine in any way I can. I think we all know that this is not about arsenic, salmon or the blunt nosed leopard lizard. It’s about control and money (extortion). No amount of good science or even constitutional law will stop these people in government from pursuing their Marxist agenda. So, which came first,water or arsenic? It doesn’t matter to them!in reply to: Miscellaneous #4552Just discovered this website, http://www.coininflation.com which provides real time metal values of all U.S. Coins. Below are values some folks might be interested in:
Description Face Value Silver Value
1942-1945 Nickel * $0.05 $1.6440
1916-1945 Mercury Dime $0.10 $2.1137
1946-1964 Roosevelt Dime $0.10 $2.1137
1916-1930 Standing Liberty Quarter $0.25 $5.2843
1932-1964 Washington Quarter $0.25 $5.2843
1916-1947 Walking Liberty Half Dollar $0.50 $10.5687
1948-1963 Franklin Half Dollar $0.50 $10.5687
1964 Kennedy Half Dollar $0.50 $10.5687
1965-1970 Half Dollar (40% silver) $0.50 $4.3214
1878-1921 Morgan Dollar $1.00 $22.6002
1921-1935 Peace Dollar $1.00 $22.6002
1971-1976 Eisenhower Dollar (40% silver) ** $1.00 $9.2403
These are the cold hard facts that the managers of our current fiat system do not want you to be aware of.
The pennies that were minted from 1909 to 1982 which are 95% copper and 5% zinc are today worth 2.8 cents each. This difference might not seem much but $1000 worth of them is valued today at $2,807. Stephen Leeb some months back projected the copper price into the future to increase by 10 times. Today, copper is $4.25 a pound.
in reply to: Risk Management Strategies #4551Mike, is it correct, that the two high grade pockets on the 1915 progress map, that you have written on in May last year – see below – would be worth 60 million US $ at todays prices?
Could you take a picture of that part of the map and send it to me or post it on the website?
in reply to: How to Approach Thin Veins & Cost #4548Tis the season! I hope everyone had a grand Christmas and continued holiday spirit!
I simply wanted to infuse the positive optimism that comes with Christmas, to remind us all of what will help us look in the right direction. When times seem down, down, we look up up up…and once again noticing (well, heck, me included here) all the negative-vibe stuff this great mine is enduring, a healthy dose of positive energy and optimism is what we need!
While the top-most topic on the News up there says “forgedaboudit” (sp?) how about NEVER forgetting about it! Miracles do happen, along with $million pockets.
in reply to: Miscellaneous #4550I have to agree. These Alaskans are real Wankers. I have worked with miners for over forty years and never met someone so stupid.
in reply to: Miscellaneous #4549I have been intrigued by the new series on discovery channel called “Gold Rush”. While watching, I have noted that these TV personalities are that pursuing the dream of finding placer gold in Alaska are pretty much wreckless in their ways. My question is: how can they broadcast these idiots completely destroying this land, wrecklessly shooting local wildlife and aimlessly digging these huge holes with no active plan or assessments to locate pay dirt. Seems like Mr. Miller is consistently and repeatly abused by are “wonderful” state for things (water tests-Kanaka creek) that occur naturally yet these guys in Alaska have no rules. Hmm!
in reply to: Water and Arsenic: which came first? #4546I just heard a leading news item regarding misallocation of “stimulous” money within the State of CA….yup, first on the list was California Water Resources Board.
..3x the allocation amount of money was used to “create jobs”….Mike, we need to look further into this one! First, it may have direct effect on the amount of $ used to pursue their adjenda; second, most obviously, has illegal funding been used to harass the mine???
- AuthorPosts
